Why these are free
These are the steps around a draft rather than the draft itself. Deciding what to write about, settling the structure, writing the description that earns the click, writing alt text somebody will actually hear, and checking whether the prose got away from you. Each one is a small job that gets skipped under time pressure, and each one costs more to skip than to do.
They are free and they stay free. Four of them call a language model, which costs us money per use, so each is limited to five or ten calls an hour from one address — a brake on abuse rather than a quota. Nothing about a request is stored: no address, no topic, no text. That also means you cannot come back for the same answer later, so copy what you want to keep.
What none of them do: search the web, read the results page, report a search volume or a keyword difficulty, or predict a ranking. PrismDraft has no source for those numbers and will not invent them, here or anywhere else. If you need keyword data, bring it from a tool that measures it.
Each tool is also one step of PrismDraft with the rest cut off. In the product the topic becomes an idea on a planning board with its keyword and intent, the outline becomes a document you approve before any prose, the article is written against it section by section with an image and alt text for each, the meta title and description are written from the finished text, and nothing publishes until a person approves it. The tools are a fair sample of the judgement behind that, which is the honest reason they exist.
Questions
Do I need an account?
No, and there is no card and no email. Four of the tools are limited to five or ten calls an hour from one address because each call costs a model request nobody is paying for.
Do you keep what I type?
No. Requests are read, answered and forgotten — no address, no topic, no text. The readability checker does not even make a request: it runs in your browser.
Why are there no search volumes anywhere?
Because we have no source for them. A number invented to look authoritative is worse than no number at all, and that is true in a free tool as much as in the product.
Are these as good as the product?
They are the same steps with the context removed. PrismDraft works from a project drafted from your whole website, with a brand voice, an image style and a record of what you have already covered, which is most of what makes the output specific to you.
Can I use the results commercially?
Yes. What the tools give you is yours — edit it, publish it, nobody is asked to attribute anything.
Are they available in French?
All five, at /fr/outils. The answers are written in the language of the page you use.